j
j advertisecontact usabout us  
search
j J, The Jewish news weekly of Northern California
j
Newsletter
Subscriptions
Change_Address

news
columns
letters
views
the arts
calendar
lifecycles
torah

supplements
classifieds
web links
candlelighting times
personals


Home
     
 

Friday April 22, 2005

Religious fanaticism remains sure-fire way to get burned

by rabbi stephen s. pearce


Achrei Mot
Lev 16:1-18:30
Malachi 3:4-24


The Torah reading Achrei Mot features the dedication of the wilderness

sanctuary and the ordination of Aaron’s sons, Nadab and Abihu. That is followed, however, by unspeakable sorrow: Aaron’s sons died because they “drew too close to the presence of the Lord” (Lev. 16:1), suggesting that they were punished for religious fanaticism.

Earlier (Lev. 10:1), their deaths are attributed to punishment for offering esh zarah (alien fire), leading some commentators to suggest that the two boys were involved in avodah zarah (idol worship), forbidden in Lev. 18:21, 20:2 and Deut. 18:10.

Whatever the reason, the heartbreak that befell Aaron is understood, at times, as a lack of justice. For example, in Vayikra Rabba, Rabbi Aha wondered how Titus, the Roman procurator, could enter the Temple with the express purpose of defiling it, even sticking his sword into the curtain of the Holy of Holies, and still emerge unscathed, whereas Nadab and Abihu, dedicated priests, perished in a ritual act performed in the service of God.

Nevertheless, the rabbis justified the deaths of Aaron’s sons because they were uncomfortable with a punishment that did not fit the crime. Thus, in order to explain this tragedy, they blamed the victims by charging Nadab and Abihu with the sins of arrogance, insolence, alcoholism, jealousy, idolatry and disrespect for their elders, in addition to fanaticism.

Others interpreted Nadab and Abihu’s religious fervor as a warning not to be overly fanatical, thereby violating the boundaries between man and God. Such was the warning to Moses when, standing before the burning bush, he heard the voice of God calling: “Moses, Moses … do not come closer. Remove your sandals from your feet, for the place on which you stand is holy ground” (Ex. 3:4-5).

This warning, “Do not come closer,” finds currency in the rabbinic period, as demonstrated by the legend of the four who entered Paradise — the orchard of intense mystical self-absorption. All but one of the participants met with madness, apostasy or death. The first three were overwhelmed by unmitigated passion and the search for ecstatic mystical union: Ben Azzai “looked and died”; Ben Zoma “looked and was stricken”; Elisha ben Abuyah was tortured by his pursuit of the absolute and became an apostate. Only Rabbi Akiba entered and exited in peace (Chagigah 14b).

Jewish tradition provides additional examples of unwavering ecstatic absorption and overzealous participation in spiritual matters. There was Abraham, hearing the word of God that demanded that Ishmael be cast out and Isaac be sacrificed. And the prophet Samuel, speaking in God’s name, ordered King Saul to kill Agag, a neighboring ruler taken captive by Saul. However, Saul showed mercy and spared Agag’s life, thereby infuriating Samuel who hacked Agag into pieces.

In the Roman period, Bar Kochba claimed to be the Messiah. His rebellion was brutally put down by the Romans.

In more modern times, other false messiahs such as Shabbetai Zevi and Jacob Frank, cast gloom over Jewish life when their objectives failed.

The antithesis of extremism finds currency in the story of the rabbi who was warned that his severest opponent, armed with a powerful argument, was headed for his home, ready for a confrontation. When the adversary burst into the home of the rabbi, full of absolute certainties, the rabbi raised his hand and uttered one word: “Efshar — perhaps. Perhaps you’re wrong, maybe I am right; maybe you are right and perhaps I am wrong.” At that they fell into earnest conversation.

British historian Lord Acton once said, “Every institution tends to perish by an excess of its own basic principle.” The antidote to fanaticism is the word efshar — perhaps. Not being blinded by zealotry allows another point of view to be considered. The tension for the modern Jew is to draw close to the fires of faith and truth but not by being so strident as to be singed by the flames.


Stephen S. Pearce is senior rabbi at the Reform Congregation Emanu-El in

San Francisco.




Did you find this article interesting? Subscribe to our FREE newsletter and you'll be notified each week when "J." goes online. We'll tell you about the most important stories of the week and give you a link to each one.

This page contains a BETA version of Amazon contextual links. They are marked by the dashed underline.  Your purchases support our site. At times they point to items which are not related to the actual link. Please alert us by email if you discover objectionable links.

 

Get hard-to-find
Kosher Items!


Featured Jobs powered by JewishCareers.com
More Local Jobs Post Jobs Post Your Resume Search Jobs


     
  Copyright ©2007, San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc., dba J. the Jewish news weekly of Northern California. All rights reserved.    

Advertise | Contact Us | About Us | News | Features | Columns | Letters | Views | The Arts
Calendar | Lifecycles | Torah | Supplements | Classifieds | Web Links | Candlelighting | Personals | Back Issues | Home